CAASD


Working Sessions
 

Collaborative Weather Rerouting Workshop

Collaborative Decision Making

  • Collaborative decision making (CDM) represents a shift from a central planning paradigm to a collaborative paradigm
    • Requires working together and the mutual understanding of the respective roles and responsibilities of those in the aviation community
  • Three specific factors define the collaborative paradigm
    • All parties must know the constraints
    • All parties must be able to react to the constraints
    • Performance must be measured, in order to improve the system

CDM Roles and Responsibilities

  • "CDM Roles & Responsibilities" guideline signed in 1995 by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) development and air traffic entities
    • Air traffic management (ATM) will:
      • Monitor the national airspace system (NAS) for constraints that produce capacity and demand problems (e.g. runway closures, weather fronts)
      • Make these constraints known to NAS users
      • Develop a baseline solution to the constraint in cooperation with the users
    • Airline operational ontrol (AOC) will:
      • Keep ATM informed of current operational demand intent
      • Provide airline business need plans and designs within the general baseline solution provided by ATM (e.g., cancellations/substitutions in response to a ground delay program)

Workshop Purpose and Scope

  • Purpose
    • Extend the roles and responsibilities agreement to the next level of detail for weather rerouting
    • Establish priorities for continued refinement of
      • Weather rerouting concepts
      • Flow management decision support research
  • Scope: collaborative focus areas
    • Information dissemination to achieve common situational awareness
    • Automation and procedures development
    • Practical application in real-time

Example: Collaboration Applied During the Resolution of a Weather Problem

  • Notional ChartData sharing might be the largest contributor to solving weather problems
  • Pro-active flight changes can reduce the need for more drastic strategies
  • Automation and procedures are the first lines of defense once a problem is identified
  • Real-time collaboration can be more effective once the specific resolution strategy is established

Workshop Objectives

  • A workshop decision on how users will collaborate with the FAA and interact with decision support systems
  • An improved understanding of participant needs and the value of their collaboration
  • Progress in reaching consensus in the three identified collaborative focus areas
  • Identification and prioritization of weather rerouting research needs

Track Structure and Objectives

  • Each track session
    • First 10 - 15 minutes: introduction to focus area
    • 1 hour: discussion of focus area
    • Last 15 minutes: prioritize concepts with respect to importance for development (i.e., which concepts should be addressed first)
  • Report-outs
    • Resulting nine prioritized lists grouped by focus area and presented on Day 2 as focus area report-outs
  • Emphasis is always upon decision support or procedural enhancements to support collaborative weather rerouting

Focus Area: Information Dissemination to Achieve Common Situational Awareness

  • Question
    • What data are needed to ensure a common situational awareness for weather problem detection and resolution and who supplies the data?
  • Examples
    • Airlines: What data do users need from the FAA for the proactive solution of a weather problem?
    • Air traffic control (ATC): What data are needed (and when) by the operational supervisor and controller to implement weather rerouting?
    • Traffic flow management (TFM): What data does TFM need from users or from other sources for weather problem identification?

Focus Area: Automation and Procedures Development

  • Question
    • What can be developed and agreed upon beforehand?
      • Decision support tools
      • Procedures
  • Examples
    • Airlines: Rationing schemes
    • ATC: Understanding complexity (e.g., use of Monitor Alert values, route design rules-of-thumb) and determining capacity
    • TFM: Adapting pre-defined routes for weather rerouting (e.g., Playbook, Low Altitude Arrival Departure Route–LAADR)

Focus Area: Practical Application in Real-Time

  • Questions
    • What are the (airline, ATC, TFM)'s primary responsibilities in weather reroute planning? For example:
      • Identify weather problem
      • Design reroutes
      • Determine reroute capacity
      • Assign specific flights to reroutes
        • Initial assignment
        • Adjustments
      • Implement reroute strategy
        • Proposed flights
        • Active flights
    • What are the (airline, ATC, TFM)'s secondary roles in weather reroute planning?
    • Is there any planning activity where collaboration is not desired or beneficial?
  • Result
    • Operational concept for real-time strategic solution of weather problem
      • Roles and responsibilities
      • Details of collaboration (e.g., cyclic planning)
        • Who, what, when, where, how

Degrees of Interaction Among Decision Makers

  • Independent: Decision makers make independent decisions with little or no interaction with other decision makers.
  • Communication: Decision makers make independent decisions while exchanging status information and decision results.
  • Coordination: Communication PLUS the rationale behind decisions may also be exchanged.
  • Cooperation: Coordination PLUS other decision makers' goals are taken into account when making independent decisions. There is some mutual understanding regarding each other's independent and shared goals.
  • Collaboration: Decision makers make joint decisions with mutual understanding regarding goals (both shared and independent).

Constraints on Collaboration

  • Not all decisions require full collaboration, i.e., joint decision making:
    • Collaboration may be too slow for some decisions (e.g., conflict avoidance)
    • Collaboration may involve a conflict of interest (e.g., user involvement in setting arrival acceptance rates)
    • Collaboration may be illegal (e.g., air carriers jointly setting long-term schedules)
  • An appropriate level of interaction for each type of decision needs to be determined

Day 2: Solve the Weather Problem

  • Group composition is now mixed:
    • Airlines
    • Air traffic supervisors
    • Traffic flow managers
  • Consider the weather problem presented
  • Are the capabilities identified in your tracks on Day 1 sufficient to solve the problem?
    • Information dissemination to achieve common situational awareness
    • Automation and procedures development
    • Practical application in real-time

Finalize Report-outs

  • Organize report-outs by focus area
    • Information dissemination to achieve common situational awareness
    • Automation and procedures development
    • Practical application in real-time
  • Revise report-outs by track based on "lessons learned" in solving weather problem

Deliver Report-outs to All Participants

  • Information dissemination to achieve common situational awareness
    • Airlines
    • ATC
    • TFM
  • Automation and procedures development
    • Airlines
    • ATC
    • TFM
  • Practical application in real-time
    • Airlines
    • ATC
    • TFM
top of page